physics4me
physicsgg
Categories
- ASTROBIOLOGY (83)
- Astrochemistry (12)
- ASTRONOMY (680)
- ASTROPHYSICS (561)
- ATOMIC PHYSICS (56)
- BIOLOGY (83)
- Chemistry (56)
- COSMOLOGY (377)
- DARK ENERGY (47)
- DARK MATTER (81)
- EDUCATION (63)
- ELECTROMAGNETISM (20)
- Fluid Dynamics (13)
- GEOLOGY (17)
- High Energy Physics (420)
- History and Philosophy of Physics (96)
- HUMOR (37)
- Materials Science (52)
- MATHEMATICS (84)
- mechanics (22)
- meteorology (13)
- MUSIC (7)
- Neuroscience (12)
- NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS (30)
- NUCLEAR PHYSICS (86)
- philosophy (26)
- PHYSICS (108)
- Poetry (2)
- Psychological Sciences (3)
- QUANTUM PHYSICS (296)
- RELATIVITY (212)
- Science fiction (17)
- SPACE (345)
- Statistical Mechanics (17)
- STRING THEORY (6)
- TECHNOLOGY (149)
- Thermodynamics (42)
- UFO (6)
- Uncategorized (93)
- VIDEO EXPERIMENT (4)
- waves (14)
Tags
ANTIMATTER ASTEROID Asteroids ATLAS Big Bang BLACK HOLES Casimir Effect Cassini CERN Chandra CMS Comet cosmic microwave background Curiosity DNA Earth EINSTEIN ESO exoplanets Extraterrestrial life Galaxies Galaxy graphene Gravitational Waves GRAVITY Hawking Herschel HIGGS Hubble Hubble Space Telescope inflation International Space Station Jupiter Kepler LHC LIGO Magnetic field mars mechanics Milky Way Moon Multiverse NASA neutrino neutrinos neutron stars Nobel Opera experiment Optics Phobos Pluto quantum computers Quantum computing Quasars robots satellites Saturn Schrödinger SETI space shuttle speed of light Spitzer Stephen Hawking Steven Weinberg String Theory Sun Superconductivity Supernova Teleportation Telescopes Tevatron TITAN Universe Very Large Telescope VoyagerArchives
Blog Stats
- 1,107,445 hits
physics4me 
What’s the bet the future never looks like this?
We can setup and install solar collectors now, but we don’t to any appreciable scale.
So why would we in the future? No, something very Jetsons is being assumed about human nature in this article that just isn’t true.
Kostas Mitropoulos
February 9, 2014 at 1:08 am